UNITY CHURCH UNIVERSAL

913 Tracy Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64106
Office: 816-421-6446 · Prayer: 816-221-6995

 

Camel's Hair or Seamless Robe?

by Rev. Greg W. Neteler
(July, 2001)

 

            Though you may dwell upon the mountaintops of the spirit, though you may glory in the splendors of the cosmos, though your mind may go out upon the vastness of the limitless and your soul ascend to unmeasurable heights, still do not for a moment deprive the body of anything that is rich and beautiful in physical existence. The great goal is the spiritual life and in the spiritual life, all the joys of sense, all the joys of intellect and all the joys of the highest heavens are divinely blended into one. The physical is sacred. The earth is the footstool of the Most High. God lives in his heaven but every atom in the visible universe thrills with the glory of his radiant presence.
—Anonymous

            Sometimes many of us who pursue a life of spiritual growth and discovery wonder if it is necessary to give up the physical pleasures we have enjoyed. Must we give up those pleasures in order to grow spiritually? Does soul growth require physical denial? There are certainly many examples throughout history—and in various world religions—of spiritual seekers who gave up all physical comfort and pleasure believing that their denial was necessary for greater understanding. Two different ways of being in the world are certainly evident in the gospels. And they are as opposite as you can imagine.

            The first is demonstrated by John the Baptist, son of Zacharias the priest and his wife Elisabeth. John was also Jesus’ cousin and was about six months older. The third chapter of Matthew gives us a view of the life John lived out in the wilderness. "Now John wore a garment of camel’s hair, and a leather girdle around his waist; and his food was locusts and wild honey." (v. 4) There are some who believe these "locusts" were the pods of the carob tree because of the tradition that has designated the tree Saint John’s bread. Unfortunately, this idea is incorrect. He actually ate locusts which were common food for the poor from ancient times to today. They were considered an acceptable food under Mosaic law. "Of them you may eat; the locust according to its kind, the bald locust according to its kind, the cricket according to its kind, and the grasshopper according to its kind." (Leviticus 11:22) A good reason to have a "previous engagement" if John invites you to dinner.

            John’s life was simple, without more refined foods and wine, the attractions of city life and fine and comfortable clothing. The picture we get of John is of one avoiding life’s physical comforts and pleasures—an ascetic life. During the last two-thousand years there have been many who followed his example seeking spiritual enlightenment. What a contrast this is to Jesus’ Life!

            Jesus was a city-boy and world traveler—if confined to the region of Israel. He had friends in government—publicans or tax and revenue collectors. He recruited Matthew from the tax office where he worked as well as friends from the lowest and poorest levels of society. He dined with many publicans and sinners which caused great concern among the Pharisees who thought that this was improper. John and Jesus were contrasted in Matthew’s gospel: "For John came neither eating nor drinking, and they say,‘He has a demon’; the Son of man came eating and drinking, and they say, ‘Behold, a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners!’ (11:18) This passage also reminds me that no matter what we do, we can’t please everyone.

            Jesus stayed many times at the home of the two wealthy sisters, Martha and Mary, who eagerly waited upon him and provided him with the best they had. During one of his visits with them Mary took a pound of fragrant ointment and applied it to Jesus’ feet. Judas, the financial officer for the band of disciples was not pleased with what he thought of as extravagant waste and thought it better to have sold the ointment and given the proceeds to the poor. That pound of ointment would have brought enough to cover the wages of 300 laborers for a day. At the wedding feast in Cana, when the wine ran out, Jesus provided an enormous quantity of the finest wine. And when it came to clothes, there was no camel’s hair for Jesus. His seamless robe was so valuable that the Roman soldiers gambled for it during the crucifixion. It was extremely fine and expensive. In Jesus’ life he lived by his own words, "it is your Father’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom." (Luke 12:32)

            Obviously there are great differences in the ways John and Jesus experienced the physical aspect of living in this world. As biblical characters, both of them represent aspects of ourselves. John, as the forerunner of Jesus, represents the enlightened intellect and an intellectual perception of Truth. It points to and prepares the way for real spiritual awareness which Jesus represents. And John does represent a form of denial, but not of physical things. He represents the process of mental denial—letting go of all the foolish and limiting intellectual concepts we have had about ourselves and about life. He represents the process of emptying the vessel of consciousness that it might be refilled with the finest wine of life. We are the clay vessels at the wedding feast in Cana. Our limited, human beliefs based on appearances and "common knowledge" fill us with inferior wine and this is the wine which runs out and leaves us depleted and empty.

            The important lesson for many of us to learn in this life is how to think and to discover what is real. Giving up material things and pleasures has no benefit in itself. Of greater importance are the thoughts and concepts in back of our use of physical things, joys and pleasures. The absolute reality of life is that this is God’s world and all things are created for us to use. Jesus understood the purpose of physical things and pleasures. They are to be used and enjoyed as gifts of God without making them the object of our existence. Unity’s co-founders—Charles and Myrtle Fillmore—understood this principle very well when they wrote their Dedication and Covenant. In this written statement, they agreed to give all they had of money, time and energy to God’s service and in turn they expected an abundant return of life, love, substance and health—all good and necessary things for life here and now.

            If you ever question whether soul growth means physical denial, remember not only the example of living Jesus demonstrated, but also Peter’s vision in Acts 10:9-15. During a journey to Caesarea, Peter stopped at a house along the way. While alone on the roof in prayer, Peter became hungry and experienced a vision. In his vision, he saw heaven open and a sheet descend by its four corners covered with all kinds of animals and reptiles and birds. A voice told him to eat but he replied, "No, Lord; for I have never eaten anything that is common or unclean." The voice answered, "What God has cleansed, you must not call common." God has created a rich environment in this world of physicality. It is all intended for good and for us to use. But the things and pleasures are not the object of our existence. Our real purpose is to express God-ness in our lives. In order to do this we must give up useless, negative beliefs and thinking. The receptive, open soul is ready to be filled with the new wine of life and the joys of living.

            But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things shall be yours as well. —Matthew 6:33

Copyright © 2001 by Greg W. Neteler
Used with permission.

Messages from previous months

 
Send mail with questions or comments about this web site to Webmaster.
Last modified: February 19, 2004